For Immediate Release :
Thursday,
June 22, 2006 Contacts : Tom Smitty Smith - Public Citizen - 512-477-1155; cell:512-797-8468 Donna Hoffman, Sierra Club, 512-299-5776 or
512-477-1729 Karen Hadden, SEED Coalition, 512-797-8481 Luke Metzger - Environment Texas - 512-478-0388
The
Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club consists of over 25,000 members.
The Chapter spans the entire state of Texas, excepting El Paso, which
is part of the Rio Grande Chapter.
Located in Austin, the Lone Star Chapter's State Conservation Office
serves Sierrans as their grassroots communications center. We also provide
Sierrans with a full time professional activist staff employed to represent
Sierrans as we fight at the state level to protect and conserve Texas'
diverse and valuable natural heritage.
New Nuclear Plants Too Risky to Build
and Too Costly to Operate
AUSTIN – Environmental groups
today decried NRG Energy Inc.’s plans to
build two new reactors at its South Texas nuclear
plant site. The costs for the reactors are expected
to reach $5 billion and will expose Texans to
the risks and radioactive wastes of nuclear power.
Nuclear power is extremely costly and relies
on taxpayer subsidies, creates radioactive waste
with no long-term disposal solution, and poses
security and public health risks.
“Thirty years ago, we were promised that
nuclear energy would produce energy ‘too
cheap to meter,’ but the costs are still
mounting,” said Tom “Smitty” Smith,
director of Public Citizen’s Texas office. “Nuclear
plants are too costly to build, too risky to operate
and the wastes are still too hot to handle.”
The existing Texas reactors built at the site
more than twenty years ago cost more than six
times the projected estimates and had so many
critical flaws that construction was halted and
parts of the plant were rebuilt to address serious
safety concerns.
Nuclear power continues to be dependent on taxpayer
handouts for survival. From 1947 to 1999, the
nuclear industry was given more than $115 billion
in direct taxpayer subsidies. The management of
nuclear waste and the requirements for reactor
decommissioning require billions more in additional
funds. In comparison, federal government subsidies
for wind and solar power totaled only $5.7 billion
over the same period – 25 times less than
nuclear subsides.
“Radioactive waste generated from nuclear
power plants is a threat to public health and
requires billions of dollars to manage. Nuclear
power also brings with it pollution from uranium
mining and the danger of reactor accidents with
potentially catastrophic results,” said
Donna Hoffman of the Lone Star Chapter of the
Sierra Club. “Do we really want to rely
on Homer Simpson technology in making our choices
about energy production?”
“Nuclear madness has arisen again, risking
our health and safety,” said Karen Hadden,
executive director of the Sustainable Energy and
Economic Development (SEED) Coalition. “Radioactive
waste can be converted to materials to make nuclear
weapons. We should lead by example and not fuel
the international weapons race by creating more
of it.”
The predicted increase in energy demand can be
met more safely and effectively by renewable sources
and efficiency measures than through building
new nuclear plants.
“Renewable energy and energy efficiency
are a viable alternative to nuclear power and
conventional fuels, and can meet the country’s
energy needs without the burdens of carbon emissions
or radioactive waste,” said Luke Metzger
of Environment Texas.