U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Proposes Comprehensive Conservation Plan for
Texas Chenier Plain Complex National Wildlife Refuges
Brandt MannchenThe U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) has
prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Land
Protection Plan (DEISCCP) for the four national wildlife refuge (NWR) Texas Chenier Plain
Complex. The four NWRs are Anahuac, Moody, McFaddin, and Texas Point. This DEISCCP sets
out the management direction for these four NWRs for the next 15 years.
The Houston Sierra Club (HSC) submitted comments on January 8, 2007 about the DEISCCP.
The HSC comments stressed:
1) Opposition to the implementation of an entrance fee for Anahuac NWR. The DEISCCP
mentioned this proposal in one sentence. The DEISCCP says nothing about the need for the
entrance fee; what the fee will pay for; the environmental impacts of the fee; and the
socioeconomic impacts of the fee. The DEISCCP does not discuss the effect of charging
citizens for visiting and enjoying the public lands they own when citizens already pay
taxes sufficient to manage these lands. Sierra Club policy opposes general entrance fees
for NWRs.
On January 16, 2007, the HSC sent the FWS a Freedom of Information Act request
regarding the analysis, evaluation, assessment, studies, and other information used to
determine that charging an entrance fee at Anahuac NWR was necessary and in the public
interest.
2) Support for Refuge Management Alternative C, which emphasized native habitat
restoration and addresses major threats to ecosystems. The HSC also proposed
reintroduction of American Bison and the phasing out of cattle grazing to help restore
native grasslands.
3) Support for Refuge Boundary Expansion Alternative D, which would add up to 104,120
acres to Anahuac, Moody, McFaddin and Texas Point NWRs; protects forested wetlands along
Taylor Bayou; and protects wetlands on Bolivar Peninsula and East Galveston Bay.
The FWS points out in the DEISCCP that the hydrology of the Texas Chenier Plain Complex
is threatened by drainage, flood control, residential, and commercial projects that are
north of, on, or near the boundary of the NWRs. In a major oversight, the DEISCCP did not
discuss the threat and cumulative environmental impacts that the proposed Texas Department
of Transportation bridge to Bolivar Peninsula poses to the water quality of East Galveston
Bay; coastal prairies and fresh and saltwater wetlands; and proposed or protected private
(Audubon Society) and federal wildlife lands (FWS) on Bolivar Peninsula and Texas Chenier
Plain Complex.
The HSC will continue to participate in and monitor the process that will lead to the
approval of the CCP.
March 2007 |