The area has been refurbished with new signage and a new
          butterfly garden..courtesy of Johnny French and the Fish anD
          Wildlife Service.
           COME CELEBRATE THE NEW LOOK          Lunch available
                                                                                          RSVP 882-4363

   Public interest groups this week labeled Governor Bush's legislation on grandfathered air pollution as "a CARE package for corporations."  "The Governor characterizes himself as a compassionate conservative.  His compassion on this issue, however, seems to be primarily for industrial corporations which have had 28 years to come up to today's modern standards for clean air--not compassion for the thousands of Texans who have to breathe dirty air because of corporate indifference," said Tom Smith, Public Citizen Texas Director.

    "The Governor's legislation is actually even worse than we expected it to be," said Ken Kramer, state director for Sierra Club. "How Governor Bush handles this issue in Texas will foreshadow how he would handle the clean air issue nationally if he is successful in his quest for the Presidency.  What we see thus far is not very comforting.  His legislation on grandfathered air plluters focuses on voluntary compliance with today's laws, use of second hand technology, credit for phantom reductions of air emissions, and corporate convenience over health effects reviews and meaningful public participation."
    Kramer characterized the legislation as "an all-you-can-eat buffet of delectable treats for plluters. 
The Governor's legislation, filed as H.B. 2504 by Rep. Ray Allen, is a veritable feast of ways in which industries may escape efforts to require significant reductions in air pollution from their plants."
    "The results of the Governor's voluntary efforts thus far have been a failure - less than one-third of 1% (only 3,600 tonsout of 900,000 thousands of tons) of the air pollution from grandfathered plants has been reduced because of that program, according to a report by the Environmental Defense entitled Too LIttle, Too Late," said Smith.  "Now the public is being asked to ignore the failure of this program and reward industry with more time to continue spewing unhealthy pllution into Texas skies."
    "The grandfathered plants volunteering to come into the pllution control permitting process would have a menu of options available to them so they can get a permit with the least possible reductions in air emissions.  These options include: voluntary emissions reduction permits, emissions permits through mitigation projects; multiple plant permits allowing some plants to avoid reducing pllution if emissions at other plants the company owns are reduced; and permit by rule," said Kramer.
    "The most bizarre of these options is a proposed new category of 'emissions permits through environmental mitigation projects,' "continued Kramer.    "Grandfathered plants might be able to avoid making significant reductions if they took 'environmental mitigation' actions totally unrelated to air quality such as creation of a wildlife or plant preserve, creation of an environmental easement, water or soil pollution prevention or remediation, wetlands enhancement, or environmental education."
    "In other owrds," said Kramer, "through this provision the Governor's bill potentially would give polluters credit for phantom reductions.  Some of these actions are things that industries would already be doing for public relations or other reasons but now they would be able to get credit for those activities to avoid emissions reductions."
"The Governor's legislation contains a stealth provision that attacks the public's right to request contested case hearings on proposed pollution for both grandfathered and new facilities applyinmg for a new type of 'standard permit." This provision is a backdoor way of enacting a portion of other heavily criticized legislation (H.B. 801)," noted Kramer.  "The Governor's office has indicated that this provision willl be dropped from the bill, and we look forward to its elimination."
    Smith concluded "that the Governor's legislation fails in six key tests:



H.B. 801 - Anti-Citizen Rights Bill

   The Texas Chemical Council bill to eliminate the opportunity for a contested case haering in pollution permit proceedings is still mired in "negotiations" involving attorneys for industry groups and attorneys for citizen intervenors.  It appears unlikely at this point that H.B. 801 as originally filed will pass.  The overwhelming public opposition and negative media coverage have blunted the direct assault on the contested case process.
    The concern now is that chemical and other industry lobbyists will try to chip away at the contested case process through the rewrite of H.B. 801 and/or through "stealth" provisions in other legislation dealing with specific types of permits.  THe Sierra Club, which is not involved in the H.B. 801 negotiations but is being kept informed about the discussions, will continue to monitor this situation closely.

  Coastal Bend Sierra Club E-Mail

Protect America's Environment.
For our families, for our future.

A Philosophy of Stewardship               

The Sierra Club's statement of Purpose is:  To explore, enjoy and protect the wild places of the earth; to practice and promote the responsible use of the earth's ecosystems and resources; to educate and enlist humanity to protect and restore the quality of the natural and human environment; and to use all lawful means to carry out these objectives.